Degenerative Myelopathy (DM) Rehabilitation

Overview

Degenerative myelopathy (DM) is a progressive, non-painful neurodegenerative disease that most commonly begins as a chronic T3–L3 myelopathy. Dogs typically develop pelvic limb proprioceptive ataxia and weakness, followed by progressive loss of ambulation and, in advanced disease, generalized weakness and respiratory compromise.

Rehabilitation cannot stop the underlying neurodegeneration. Its role is to preserve safe mobility, maintain meaningful activity, prevent secondary complications, and support the dog and caregiver throughout functional decline.

Key Clinical Points

Rehabilitation should begin while the dog is still ambulatory

• Early intervention provides the greatest opportunity to preserve strength, coordination, and functional mobility.

• Do not wait for significant weakness or loss of ambulation before initiating rehabilitation.

Activity dose matters

• Evidence supports frequent, structured rehabilitation rather than low-dose or inconsistent treatment.

• Prioritize repetitive, task-specific locomotor activity while avoiding function-limiting fatigue.

Treat function, not the calendar

• DM progression is variable, and rehabilitation should follow functional level rather than time since diagnosis.

• Reassess objective function at least every 4 weeks and modify treatment as mobility changes.

“With degenerative myelopathy, rehabilitation cannot stop the disease—but it can help preserve safe mobility, meaningful activity, and quality of life throughout functional decline.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Preserve safe ambulation for as long as possible.

• Maintain strength, coordination, postural control, and endurance.

• Use repetitive, task-specific locomotor training as the foundation of treatment.

Evidence Snapshot

• Intensive, structured physiotherapy has been associated with longer maintenance of ambulation and survival compared with lower-intensity or absent rehabilitation in dogs with DM.

• Rehabilitation benefit appears to be related to frequency and amount of purposeful activity, rather than any single modality.

• Underwater treadmill training can increase opportunities for repetitive, coordinated stepping while reducing effective body weight and fall risk.

Clinical Pearls

• Gait quality over quantity: Stop or modify exercise when coordination deteriorates or function-limiting fatigue develops.

• Introduce assistive devices early; they are tools for preserving participation, not simply end-stage equipment.

• Quality of life is not defined by independent walking alone.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

• References

  ‍ Bouché, A. F., Levine, J. M., & Vitale, C. (2023). Diagnosis and management of dogs with degenerative myelopathy: A survey of neurologists and rehabilitation professionals. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 37(2), 1322–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16663

  ‍ ‍

  Gouveia, M. A. F., Moniz, M. A. M. S., de Oliveira, A. L., de Carvalho, D. C. E., de Moura Chaves, J. S., Korimá, Á. B., ... Bavaresco, L. (2023). Intensive neurorehabilitation and allogeneic stem cells transplantation in canine degenerative myelopathy. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, Article 10374290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.10374290

  ‍ ‍

  Kathmann, I., Cizinauskas, S., Doherr, M. G., Steffen, F., & Jaggy, A. (2006). Daily controlled physiotherapy increases survival time in dogs with suspected degenerative myelopathy. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 20(4), 927–932. https://doi.org/10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[927:DCPIS]2.0.CO;2

  ‍ ‍

  Kobatake, Y., Nakata, K., Sakai, H., Sasaki, J., Yamato, O., Takashima, S., Nishii, N., Maeda, S., Islam,M. S., & Kamishina, H. (2021). The long-term clinical course of canine degenerative myelopathy and therapeutic potential of curcumin. Veterinary Sciences, 8(9), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8090192

  ‍ ‍

  Kowal, J. B., Verga, S. A., Pandeya, S. R., Cochran, R. J., Rutkove, S. B., & Coates, J. R. (2022). Electrical impedance myography in dogs with degenerative myelopathy. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, Article 874277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.874277

  ‍ ‍

Degenerative Myelopathy (DM) Rehabilitation FAQ

• When can rehabilitation for Degenerative Myelopathy (DM) Begin?

  Rehabilitation should begin as early as possible while the dog remains independently ambulatory. Early treatment focuses on preserving strength, coordination, postural control, endurance, and safe mobility rather than waiting for significant functional decline.

• Can rehabilitation stop degenerative myelopathy from progressing?

  No. Rehabilitation has not been shown to stop the underlying neurodegenerative disease. Structured, frequent rehabilitation can help preserve function, maintain meaningful activity, manage secondary complications, and support quality of life as the disease progresses.

• How much exercise should a dog with degenerative myelopathy receive?

  Exercise should be frequent, structured, and individualized. Multiple short bouts of purposeful activity are generally preferred to prolonged exercise. Treatment should be modified when gait quality deteriorates and should not create function-limiting fatigue.

• When should a dog with degenerative myelopathy use an assistive device?

  Assistive devices should be introduced before mobility becomes unsafe. Rear-support harnesses, slings, carts, and environmental modifications can reduce falls, preserve participation, and allow dogs to remain safely active as neurologic function declines.

• What is the primary goal of rehabilitation for degenerative myelopathy?

  The primary goal is to preserve meaningful function and quality of life for as long as possible. As the disease progresses, rehabilitation goals shift from maintaining independent ambulation to supported mobility, prevention of secondary complications, comfort, caregiver support, and continued participation in activities the dog enjoys.

To learn more, download the Degenerative Myelopathy Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.

Peripheral Neuropathies Rehabilitation

Overview

Peripheral neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system and resulting in lower motor neuron dysfunction. Common clinical findings include distal weakness, muscle atrophy, reduced or absent spinal reflexes, proprioceptive deficits, gait instability, and declining functional mobility. Depending on the underlying disease, cranial nerves, respiratory muscles, or autonomic function may also be affected.

The expected clinical trajectory varies substantially among peripheral neuropathies. Some conditions have the potential for neurologic recovery, while others are progressive and degenerative. Identifying the expected disease behavior is the first step in rehabilitation planning because it determines whether treatment targets functional recovery or long-term function preservation.

Key Clinical Points

The diagnosis determines the rehabilitation pathway

• Pathway 1 – Recovery-Based: Used for peripheral neuropathies with potential for neurologic recovery, including acute idiopathic polyradiculoneuritis and some metabolic or toxic neuropathies.

• Pathway 2 – Long-Term Function Preservation: Used for progressive degenerative polyneuropathies, including GOLPP.

Exercise dosing differs between pathways

• Recovery-based conditions require progressive loading as neurologic function and functional capacity improve.

• Progressive conditions require submaximal, repeatable activity with careful fatigue management.

Function, not the calendar, guides rehabilitation

• Recovery-based patients progress through Functional Levels 1–5 as mobility and independence return.

• Progressive patients advance through Disease Stages 1–5 as neurologic function declines and assistance requirements increase.

“Peripheral neuropathies are not managed the same. Rehabilitation strategy should match the expected disease trajectory—building capacity when recovery is possible and preserving safe, meaningful function when disease is progressive.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Identify whether the neuropathy follows a recovery-based or progressive clinical trajectory.

• Preserve safe, task-specific functional mobility.

• Match exercise intensity and progression to the selected rehabilitation pathway.

Evidence Snapshot

• Peripheral neuropathies represent multiple disease processes with different prognoses and expected patterns of neurologic recovery or decline.

• Task-specific locomotor training provides opportunities for repetitive practice of standing, stepping, transfers, and gait.

• Rehabilitation dosing should be individualized according to neurologic status, movement quality, fatigue response, and functional goals.

• In progressive polyneuropathies, rehabilitation does not reverse the underlying degeneration; treatment focuses on preserving mobility, minimizing secondary complications, and supporting quality of life.

Clinical Pearls

• Know the pathway before setting the goals. The same functional deficit may require a different rehabilitation strategy depending on whether neurologic recovery is expected.

• In recovery-based neuropathies, gradually reduce external assistance and increase functional challenge as neurologic control returns.

• In progressive neuropathies, introduce assistive devices before repeated falls or complete loss of mobility makes adaptation more difficult.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

• References

  ‍

  Anderson, R. S., Chu, A. K., Binversie, E. E., Komlofske, K., Rochkind, S. J., Sample, S. J., & Scott, G. M. (2024). Pathologic classification of a late-onset peripheral neuropathy in a spontaneous Labrador retriever dog model. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 532(3), e25596. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.25596

  DeGroot, W. D., Tobias, K. M., Browning, D. C., & Zhu, X. (2020). Examination of laryngeal function of healthy dogs by using sedation protocols with dexmedetomidine. Veterinary Surgery, 49(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13334

  Moore, S. A. (2016). Managing neuropathic pain in dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 3, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00012 (background)

  Rishniw, M., Sammarco, J., Glass, E. N., & Cerroni, B. (2021). Effect of doxepin on quality of life in Labrador retrievers with laryngeal paralysis: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 35(4), 1943–1949. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16162

  Sample, S. J., Stilin, A., Binversie, E. E., Baker, L. A., & Hardie, R. J. (2020). Late-onset laryngeal paralysis: Owner perception of quality of life and cause of death. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 6(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.240

  Shubert, M. P., & Ganjei, J. B. (2023). Outcome following elective unilateral arytenoid lateralization performed in an outpatient manner is comparable to hospitalization for dogs with laryngeal paralysis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 261(9), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.23.02.0121

  
  ‍

Peripheral Neuropathies Rehabilitation FAQ

• When should rehabilitation begin for a dog with peripheral neuropathy?

  Rehabilitation should begin once the patient is medically stable and the veterinarian has determined that rehabilitation is appropriate. Early intervention can help preserve joint mobility, minimize secondary complications, and begin appropriate functional mobility training.

• Do dogs with peripheral neuropathy recover?

  It depends on the underlying diagnosis. Some peripheral neuropathies have the potential for neurologic recovery, while progressive degenerative polyneuropathies result in ongoing functional decline. Establishing the diagnosis and expected disease behavior is therefore essential when determining rehabilitation goals.

• How is rehabilitation different for recovery-based and progressive peripheral neuropathies?

  Recovery-based rehabilitation progressively increases functional challenge as neurologic function returns, with the goal of restoring independent mobility. Progressive disease management uses sustainable, submaximal activity and increasing support to preserve mobility, safety, and quality of life for as long as possible.

• How much exercise should a dog with peripheral neuropathy receive?

  Exercise dosing should be individualized according to neurologic status, functional ability, movement quality, fatigue response, and the underlying disease trajectory. Recovery-based patients may tolerate progressive increases in workload, while dogs with progressive neuropathies require careful fatigue management.

• When should a dog with peripheral neuropathy use an assistive device?

  Assistive devices should be introduced when they improve safety, movement quality, or functional independence. In recovery-based conditions, they may provide temporary support and can be reduced as function improves. In progressive conditions, harnesses, slings, carts, and environmental modifications may become increasingly important as mobility declines.

To learn more, download the Peripheral Neuropathies Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.

Lumbosacral Rehabilitation

Overview

Canine degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) is characterized by compression of the cauda equina and/or lumbosacral nerve roots at the L7–S1 junction. Clinical signs may include lumbosacral pain, pelvic limb lameness or weakness, radicular pain, reduced activity tolerance, and, in more advanced cases, neurologic deficits affecting the pelvic limbs, tail, or sphincter function.

Lumbosacral compression is position-sensitive. Extension of the lumbopelvic complex may increase compression, while neutral-to-flexed positioning may reduce compression. Rehabilitation therefore emphasizes pain control, appropriate positioning, progressive core stabilization, and restoration of functional activity while minimizing provocative extension.

Key Clinical Points

Lumbopelvic position drives rehabilitation

• Maintain the lumbopelvic complex in neutral to slight flexion during therapeutic exercise and functional activities.

• Avoid excessive hip extension combined with ventral pelvic tilt and lumbosacral extension, particularly during the painful stages of recovery.

Core strength is central to long-term management

• Progressive activation of the transversus abdominis, multifidus, abdominal musculature, and spinal stabilizers improves dynamic control of the pelvis and lumbar spine.

• Improved core control helps limit excessive lumbopelvic extension during functional movement.

Progression is based on movement quality, not time alone

• Advance activity when the dog can complete the current task pain-free while maintaining appropriate lumbopelvic alignment.

• If neutral pelvic control cannot be maintained, continue treatment at the current functional level before progressing.

“For lumbosacral disease, rehabilitation progression is driven by pain-free control of the lumbopelvic complex—not simply strength or time.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Reduce pain and nerve root irritation while avoiding extension-provocative loading.

• Optimize hip mobility and core strength to improve control of pelvic position during movement.

• Progress from controlled functional mobility to walking, community mobility, vehicle transfers, recreational activity, and sport- or work-specific tasks.

Evidence Snapshot

• Canine-specific rehabilitation evidence for DLSS remains limited; therefore, treatment planning combines available veterinary evidence with biomechanical principles and rehabilitation evidence from human lumbar spinal stenosis.

• Current evidence supports structured, active rehabilitation rather than prolonged rest alone, with progressive exercise used to restore function and conditioning.

• Veterinary studies support both conservative and surgical management pathways for DLSS, while postoperative rehabilitation protocols remain poorly standardized.

Clinical Pearls

• Hip extension and lumbosacral extension are not the same thing: hip mobility should be optimized so limited hip extension does not force compensatory ventral pelvic tilt and excessive extension through the lumbosacral complex.

• The UWT prescription should change with recovery: early treatment should use slower speeds, greater buoyancy, and shorter, more frequent sessions to minimize pelvic excursion. Later treatment can use lower water levels, jets, and short bouts of increased demand for dynamic stabilization.

• Core control matters during function: strengthening is valuable when it improves the dog's ability to control the pelvis and lumbar spine during standing, walking, transitions, and progressively more demanding activities.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

• References

  ‍ 

  Lin, L. H., Lin, T. Y., Chang, K. V., Wu, W. T., & Özçakar, L. (2023). Neural mobilization for reducing pain and disability in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Life, 13(12), 2255. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13122255

  
  Mathew, K., Flynn, C., Karakash, W., Avetisian, H., Wang, J. C., & Lantz, J. M. (2025). The effects of postoperative activity restrictions on outcomes after spine surgery: A systematic review. Journal of Spine Surgery, 11(4), 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-25-87

  
  Medina-Serra, R., Laredo, F. G., de Strobel, F., Sanchis-Mora, S., & Belda, E. (2026). Interventional pain management in dogs with lumbosacral stenosis: Preliminary long-term clinical outcomes of combined foraminal and epidural injections with or without pulsed radiofrequency. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, 1730491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1730491

  
  Minetama, M., Kawakami, M., Teraguchi, M., Kagotani, R., Mera, Y., Sumiya, T., Nakagawa, M., Yamamoto, Y., Matsuo, S., Sakon, N., Nakatani, T., Kitano, T., & Nakagawa, Y. (2021). Supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 35(7), 964–975. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520986688

  
  Özden, F., & Koçyiğit, G. Z. (2024). The effect of early rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery, 39, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-024-00270-z

Lumbosacral Disease Rehabilitation FAQ

• When should rehabilitation begin for lumbosacral disease?

  Rehabilitation may begin once the patient is medically stable, pain is adequately managed, and significant red-flag pathology has been addressed. Postoperative rehabilitation should follow surgeon-specific precautions.

• Why is lumbopelvic position important in lumbosacral disease?

  Extension may increase compression at the lumbosacral junction. Rehabilitation therefore emphasizes neutral-to-slightly-flexed positioning and progressive core control to minimize excessive extension during functional movement.

• Should activity be restricted in dogs with lumbosacral disease?

  Uncontrolled extension-provoking activities such as jumping, sprinting, stairs, and rough play should initially be restricted. Controlled therapeutic movement is progressively increased according to pain, neurologic status, and movement quality.

• What is the role of underwater treadmill therapy for lumbosacral disease?

  Early UWT treatment can reduce loading and pelvic excursion using higher water levels, slower speeds, and short treatment bouts. As strength improves, lower water levels and controlled external challenges can progressively turn UWT exercise into dynamic lumbopelvic stabilization training.

• What determines progression through lumbosacral rehabilitation?

  Progression is based on pain, neurologic status, functional capacity, and the ability to maintain appropriate lumbopelvic alignment. If a functional task cannot be completed pain-free with adequate pelvic control, treatment should continue at that level before advancing.

To learn more, download the Lumbosacral Disease Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.

Intervertebral Disc Disease (IVDD) Type II Rehabilitation

Overview

Intervertebral Disc Disease (IVDD) Type II is characterized by chronic degeneration of the annulus fibrosus with progressive protrusion of the intervertebral disc into the vertebral canal. The resulting chronic spinal cord and/or nerve root compression may produce progressive ataxia, paresis, proprioceptive deficits, reduced endurance, and intermittent or persistent spinal pain.

Unlike Type I extrusion, Type II IVDD typically develops gradually and is often managed as a chronic neurologic condition. Rehabilitation is an essential component of the conservative care pathway, with treatment directed toward protecting the spine, controlling pain, minimizing secondary deconditioning, and progressively improving strength, coordination, gait, and functional mobility.

Key Clinical Points

Neurologic status drives rehabilitation
• Establish baseline pain, strength, proprioception, gait quality, and functional mobility.
• Progress rehabilitation according to neurologic stability and functional performance rather than time alone.

Active, task-specific rehabilitation is essential
• Progress from postural control and functional transitions to standing, stepping, and coordinated gait according to neurologic ability.
• Progressive strengthening, balance, and endurance training become increasingly important as pain stabilizes.

Chronic disease requires long-term load management
• Protect the spine from uncontrolled twisting, impact, and excessive loading while maintaining appropriate functional activity.
• Adjust exercise according to pain, gait quality, neurologic function, and fatigue response.

“For IVDD Type II, rehabilitation progression is driven by neurologic stability, movement quality, and functional capacity—not simply time.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Maintain neutral spinal alignment during positioning, transfers, and therapeutic exercise.
• Control pain and address secondary musculoskeletal restrictions that interfere with functional movement.
• Preserve mobility and minimize secondary muscle weakness and physical deconditioning.

Evidence Snapshot

• Current canine spinal rehabilitation evidence supports structured, active rehabilitation for dogs with incomplete spinal cord dysfunction, although much of the higher-level evidence is derived from Type I IVDD populations.
• Repetitive, task-specific locomotor training supports motor relearning and functional recovery when residual neural pathways are present.
• Multimodal rehabilitation combining therapeutic exercise, locomotor training, neuromuscular interventions, and appropriate pain management provides a more comprehensive approach than reliance on passive modalities alone.

Clinical Pearls

• Pain relief does not equal neurologic stability: reduced pain should not be used alone to determine readiness for increased activity; gait, strength, proprioception, and functional mobility must also remain stable.
• Quality before quantity: stop or modify exercise when fatigue causes increased ataxia, knuckling, dragging, loss of postural control, or deterioration in movement quality.
• Strength matters in chronic disease: persistent neurologic impairment is compounded by disuse weakness and deconditioning; progressive strengthening should become a major treatment priority once pain is controlled.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

• References

  ‍ 

  Beukers, M., Grinwis, G. C. M., Vernooij, J. C. M., van der Hoek, L., Tellegen, A. R., Meij, B. P., Veraa, S., Samartzis, D., Tryfonidou, M. A., & Bach, F. C. (2023). Epidemiology of Modic changes in dogs: Prevalence, possible risk factors, and association with spinal phenotypes. JOR Spine, 6(3), e1273.

  Clemot, I. B., Briola, C., Ekiri, A. B., Cappello, R., Marinelly, R., Brocal, J., Prodger, A., & Mari, L. (2026). Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine in neutral and flexed position for presurgical assessment of clinically affected dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. Veterinary Surgery, 55(1), 153–164.

  da Costa, R. C., De Decker, S., Lewis, M. J., & Volk, H. A. (2020). Diagnostic imaging in intervertebral disc disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 588338.

  Fenn, J., Olby, N. J., & the Canine Spinal Cord Injury Consortium (CANSORT-SCI). (2020). Classification of intervertebral disc disease. (CANSORT-SCI statement).

  Gomes, S. A., Lowrie, M., & Targett, M. P. (2020). Single dose epidural methylprednisolone as a treatment and predictor of outcome following subsequent decompressive surgery in degenerative lumbosacral stenosis with foraminal stenosis. The Veterinary Journal, 257, 105451.

Intervertebral Disc Disease (IVDD) Type II Rehabilitation FAQ

• When should rehabilitation begin for IVDD Type II?

  Rehabilitation may begin once the patient is medically stable and pain is adequately controlled. Initial treatment emphasizes spinal protection, comfortable mobility, and prevention of secondary complications before progressing to strengthening and higher-level neurologic exercise.

• How does rehabilitation for Type II IVDD differ from Type I IVDD?

  Type I IVDD commonly involves an acute disc extrusion and may require either conservative management or post-operative rehabilitation. Type II IVDD is typically a chronic protrusive process, so rehabilitation places greater emphasis on long-term management of strength, proprioception, coordination, endurance, and functional mobility.

• Should activity be restricted in dogs with Type II IVDD?

  Activity should be controlled according to pain and neurologic status. High-impact activity, jumping, uncontrolled spinal motion, and activities that worsen neurologic function should be restricted, while appropriate controlled movement is progressively incorporated to minimize weakness and deconditioning. Follow the veterinarian’s orders.

• What is the role of underwater treadmill therapy for IVDD Type II?

  Underwater treadmill therapy can provide supported, repetitive locomotor practice while allowing modification of weight bearing and assistance according to neurologic ability. It should be incorporated as part of a broader task-specific rehabilitation program rather than used as a stand-alone intervention.

• What determines progression through IVDD Type II rehabilitation?

  Progression is based on stable or improving pain, neurologic status, strength, postural control, gait quality, proprioception, functional mobility, and exercise tolerance. Rehabilitation should be modified and veterinary reassessment pursued if neurologic function deteriorates.

To learn more, download the Intervertebral Disc Disease (IVDD) Type II Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.

Intervertebral Disc Disease (IVDD) Type I Rehabilitation

Overview

Intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) Type I is characterized by degeneration and acute extrusion of the nucleus pulposus into the vertebral canal, resulting in spinal cord compression and variable neurologic injury. Dogs may present with acute spinal pain, proprioceptive deficits and ataxia, paresis or paralysis, and altered muscle tone leading to impaired functional transitions and ambulation.

Management may be conservative or surgical depending on neurologic severity, imaging findings, pain, and veterinary assessment. Rehabilitation supports both pathways by protecting the spine, managing secondary impairments, and progressively restoring functional mobility.

Key Clinical Points

Neurologic status drives rehabilitation
• Complete a neurologic assessment before progressing rehabilitation.
• Preserved deep pain perception is an important positive prognostic indicator.
• New or progressive neurologic deficits require veterinary reassessment.

Task-specific locomotor training is the foundation
• Progress from postural transitions to standing, stepping, and coordinated gait according to neurologic ability.
• Use repetitive, goal-directed locomotor practice rather than relying primarily on passive interventions.

Conservative management requires continued spinal protection
• Maintain prescribed activity restriction during disc healing even when pain and clinical signs improve.
• Serial neurologic examinations are essential to confirm stability or improvement before advancing activity.

“For IVDD Type I, rehabilitation progression follows neurologic recovery—not simply time since injury or surgery.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Protect the spine by maintaining neutral spinal alignment.
• Control pain and secondary musculoskeletal impairments.
• Preserve joint mobility and soft tissue flexibility during periods of reduced mobility.
• Restore postural transitions, standing, stepping, and functional gait.

Evidence Snapshot

• Recent canine spinal rehabilitation studies support early, structured rehabilitation once the patient is medically stable, particularly in dogs with incomplete spinal cord injury and preserved nociception.
• Intensive multimodal neurorehabilitation programs combining therapeutic exercise, locomotor training, electrical stimulation, and supportive care have demonstrated favorable ambulation outcomes in severe thoracolumbar IVDE cohorts.
• Evidence in deep pain-negative dogs is mixed. Rehabilitation dose, intensity, protocol structure, and neurologic severity appear to be important when interpreting expected outcomes.

Clinical Pearls

• Pain relief does not equal disc healing: especially during conservative management, improved comfort should not be used alone to justify increasing activity.
• Quality before quantity: stop or modify locomotor training when fatigue causes deterioration in stepping, postural control, or coordination.
• Use support to improve movement, not replace it: slings, body-weight support, underwater treadmill, and mobility devices should facilitate active, coordinated movement while maintaining spinal alignment.
• Reassess before progressing: pain, neurologic status, functional mobility, and exercise response should determine advancement through rehabilitation.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

• References

  ‍

  Bach, F. S., Rebelatto, C. L. K., Fracaro, L., Senegaglia, A. C., Fragoso, F. Y. I., Daga, D. R., Brofman, P. R. S., Pimpão, C. T., Engracia Filho, J. R., Montiani-Ferreira, F., & Villanova, J. A., Jr. (2019). Comparison of the efficacy of surgical decompression alone and combined with canine adipose tissue-derived stem cell transplantation in dogs with acute thoracolumbar disk disease and spinal cord injury. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00383 

  Bruno, E., Canal, S., Antonucci, M., Bernardini, M., Balducci, F., Musella, V., Mussoni, M., & Spinella, G. (2020). Perilesional photobiomodulation therapy and physical rehabilitation in post-operative recovery of dogs surgically treated for thoracolumbar disk extrusion. BMC Veterinary Research, 16, Article 120.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02333-3 

  Jeong, I. S., Piao, Z., Rahman, M. M., Kim, S., & Kim, N. S. (2019). Canine thoracolumbar intervertebral disk herniation and rehabilitation therapy after surgical decompression: A retrospective study. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research, 6(3), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2019.f359 

  Jeong, I.-S., Rahman, M. M., Choi, G.-C., Seo, B.-S., Lee, G.-J., Kim, S., & Kim, N. S. (2019). A retrospective study of canine cervical disk herniation and the beneficial effects of rehabilitation therapy after ventral slot decompression. Veterinarni Medicina, 64(6), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.17221/114/2018-VETMED 

Intervertebral Disc Disease (IVDD) Type I Rehabilitation FAQ

• When should rehabilitation begin after IVDD Type I?

  Rehabilitation can begin once the patient is medically stable and pain is adequately controlled. Early treatment initially emphasizes spinal protection, positioning, prevention of secondary complications, and safe functional mobility. Exercise intensity progresses according to neurologic status and patient tolerance.

• How is rehabilitation different for conservative versus post-operative IVDD Type I?

  The core rehabilitation principles are similar, but conservative management requires greater emphasis on protecting the healing disc. Activity restriction is maintained during the prescribed healing period, and serial neurologic examinations are used to confirm stability or improvement before activity is advanced. Post-operative rehabilitation additionally considers surgical-site healing and surgeon-directed restrictions.

• Should activity increase when a conservatively managed dog starts feeling better?

  Not automatically. Analgesics and corticosteroids may improve pain and clinical signs before adequate disc healing has occurred. Prescribed activity restriction should continue unless the veterinarian and rehabilitation professional determine that progression is appropriate.

• What is the role of underwater treadmill therapy for IVDD Type I?

  Underwater treadmill therapy is used as a task-specific locomotor training tool. It can provide body-weight support and facilitate repetitive, coordinated stepping in appropriately selected patients. Water depth, speed, assistance, and treatment duration should be individualized according to neurologic function and movement quality.

• What determines progression through IVDD Type I rehabilitation?

  Progression should be criterion-based rather than determined by time alone. Pain control, neurologic stability, postural control, strength, coordination, gait quality, fatigue response, and functional independence should guide treatment advancement.

To learn more, download the Intervertebral Disc Disease (IVDD) Type I Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.

Medial Shoulder Instability (MSI) Rehabilitation

Overview

Medial shoulder instability (MSI) is a common cause of forelimb lameness in active and sporting dogs. Injury to the medial glenohumeral ligament, joint capsule, and subscapularis tendon results in shoulder laxity, pain, and reduced athletic performance. Successful rehabilitation emphasizes protecting healing tissues while progressively restoring dynamic shoulder stability.

Key Clinical Points

Diagnosis requires more than an abduction angle

• Shoulder abduction testing is helpful but should never be used alone.

• Clinical examination and advanced imaging provide a more accurate diagnosis.

Conservative treatment is the first choice

• Most Grade I and II injuries respond well to rehabilitation.

• Surgery is generally reserved for severe or non-responsive cases.

Dynamic stability is the goal

• Rehabilitation focuses on restoring muscular control rather than simply reducing pain.

• Progressive loading helps protect the healing ligament while improving shoulder function.

“Successful medial shoulder instability rehabilitation restores shoulder stability through controlled loading, progressive strengthening, and protection of healing tissues.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Protect injured medial shoulder structures.

• Control pain and inflammation.

• Restore dynamic shoulder stability.

• Progress strengthening without increasing instability.

• Return to pain-free functional activity.

Evidence Snapshot

• Conservative rehabilitation is recommended as first-line treatment for most dogs with MSI.

• Clinical rehabilitation programs report excellent return to function in appropriately managed cases.

• There is currently no evidence that one surgical technique consistently produces superior outcomes.

• Successful outcomes depend on matching treatment progression to tissue healing and shoulder stability.

Clinical Pearls

• Treat instability before progressing strengthening.

• Grade the injury to guide rehabilitation progression.

• Monitor the entire kinetic chain for compensatory dysfunction.

• Return to sport should be based on function—not time alone.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

Watch clinical demonstrations, treatment techniques, and practical applications.

• References

  Alva BM, Pechette Markley AR, Shoben AB, Kieves NR. Owner-reported treatments and outcomes of perceived injuries to the thoracic and pelvic limb of agility dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2024;11:1409199. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1409199

  Arena I, Valentini S, Nundini L, Dalmonte T, Spinella G. Physiotherapy treatment of musculo-tendinous disorders of the canine shoulder: A clinical study. Vet J. 2025;313:106379. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106379

  Gemignani F, Harel M, Livet V, Barthelemy A, Segard E, Cachon T, et al. Pilot study of the ultrasonographic examination of the intact and transected medial glenohumeral ligament in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2023;64(2):306-313. doi: 10.1111/vru.13164

  Hammer M, Grand JG. Inverted V-shaped extracapsular stabilisation technique and arthroscopic findings in six dogs with medial shoulder instability. J Small Anim Pract. 2021;62(9):795-804. doi: 10.1111/jsap.13347

  Hebrard L, Copet A, Blondel M, Cachon T. Video-assisted ligamentoplasty effectively treats medial shoulder instability in dogs: a retrospective study of 6 cases. Am J Vet Res. 2025;86(8). doi: 10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0388

  Jones SC, Howard J, Bertran J, Johnson B, Pozzi A, Litsky AS, et al. Measurement of shoulder abduction angles in dogs: an ex vivo study of accuracy and repeatability. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2019;32(6):427-432. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692410

  Kieves NR, Jones SC. There is no superior treatment method for medial shoulder instability in dogs. Vet Evid. 2020;5(1). doi: 10.18849/ve.v5i1.249

  Livet V, Harel M, Taroni M, Carozzo C, Viguier E, Sonet J, et al. Stress radiography for the diagnosis of medial glenohumeral ligament rupture in canine shoulders. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2019;32(6):433-439. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692469

  Pechette Markley AR, Shoben AB, Kieves NR. Internet-based survey of the frequency and types of orthopedic conditions and injuries experienced by dogs competing in agility. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021;259(9):1001-1008. doi: 10.2460/javma.259.9.1001

  Rocheleau PJ, Dycus DL, Lotsikas PJ, Robson A. Internet-based survey on diagnosis and treatment recommendations for medial shoulder syndrome and instability in dogs. Can Vet J. 2024;65(8):781-790.

  Woolley ELE, Collyer TA, Finch SJ, House AK. Medial shoulder instability: prevalence and treatment outcomes in 17 poodles and 31 dogs of other breeds. VCOT Open. 2023;6:e107-e113. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1774372

Medial Shoulder Instability Rehabilitation FAQ

• When should rehabilitation begin for medial shoulder instability?

  Rehabilitation should begin as soon as therapy is ordered by the veterinarian. Early treatment helps control pain, protect healing tissues, and reduce compensatory movement patterns.

• Can medial shoulder instability heal without surgery?

  Maybe. Many Grade I and Grade II injuries respond well to conservative management with activity modification, rehabilitation, and, when needed, external support. More severe injuries may require surgical stabilization.

• What activities should dogs with medial shoulder instability avoid?

  High-impact activities such as repetitive ball chasing, jumping, rough play, sharp turns, and uncontrolled running should be avoided until healing is well underway, usually more than 8 weeks.

• How long does rehabilitation take?

  Rehabilitation typically takes 8–12 weeks for mild to moderate injuries. More severe injuries or dogs returning to athletic activities may require 3–6 months, with progression based on shoulder stability, strength, and function rather than a fixed timeline.

• What is the primary goal of rehabilitation?

  The primary goal is to restore dynamic muscular shoulder stability so the dog can return to comfortable, pain-free function while minimizing the risk of reinjury.

To learn more, download the Medial Shoulder Instability Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources..

Elbow Dysplasia Rehabilitation

Overview

Elbow dysplasia is one of the most common developmental orthopedic diseases affecting the canine elbow. It includes fragmented medial coronoid process (FMCP), osteochondritis dissecans (OCD), ununited anconeal process (UAP), and elbow incongruity. These conditions alter normal joint loading, leading to pain, reduced range of motion, lameness, and progressive osteoarthritis. Successful rehabilitation combines medical management, weight optimization, progressive therapeutic exercise, and long-term load management to improve function and quality of life.

Key Clinical Points

Radiographs do not tell the whole story

• Imaging findings often do not correlate with the dog's functional limitations.

• Rehabilitation progression should be based on clinical function, gait quality, and response to loading—not imaging alone.

Weight management is one of the most effective treatments

• Maintaining a lean body condition significantly decreases joint loading.

• Obesity accelerates osteoarthritis progression and worsens long-term outcomes.

Rehabilitation is central to long-term success

• Controlled strengthening, underwater treadmill therapy, and gradual loading improve mobility and reduce compensation.

• Lifelong management is often necessary, even after surgery.

“Successful elbow dysplasia rehabilitation focuses on restoring comfortable function through progressive loading, weight management, and lifelong protection of the joint.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Reduce pain and inflammation while protecting the medial elbow compartment.

• Restore comfortable elbow range of motion and symmetrical limb loading.

• Strengthen the shoulder, elbow, and entire kinetic chain using progressive closed-chain exercise.

• Optimize body condition to reduce mechanical stress on the joint.

• Monitor compensatory movement patterns and adjust activity based on clinical response rather than radiographs.

Evidence Snapshot

• Recent systematic reviews suggest that selected dogs with fragmented medial coronoid disease may achieve outcomes comparable to surgery when managed conservatively with structured rehabilitation.

• Long-term studies demonstrate that radiographic severity does not reliably predict clinical progression, emphasizing functional assessment during rehabilitation.

• Underwater treadmill therapy has been shown to improve elbow range of motion and stride length while reducing joint loading.

• Maintaining a lean body weight remains one of the strongest evidence-based interventions for slowing osteoarthritis progression.

Clinical Pearls

• Evaluate the entire kinetic chain—shoulder, cervical spine, trunk, and opposite limb frequently develop compensatory dysfunction.

• Dogs often continue exercising despite pain; owners should regulate activity rather than allowing self-limitation.

• Progress exercise based on recovery after activity, gait symmetry, and comfort—not predetermined timelines.

• Even following successful surgery, long-term rehabilitation and weight management remain essential to minimize osteoarthritis progression.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

Watch clinical demonstrations, treatment techniques, and practical applications.

• References

  Bruecker, K. A., Benjamino, K., Vezzoni, A., Walls, C. M., Wendelburg, K. L., Follette, C. M., Déjardin, L. M., & Guillou, R. (2021). Canine elbow dysplasia: Medial compartment disease and osteoarthritis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 51(2), 475–515.

  Graves, J. L., McKenzie, B. A., Koch, Z., Naka, A.,Spofford, N., & Morrison, J. (2023). Body weight, gonadectomy, and other risk factors for diagnosis of osteoarthritis in companion dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1275964.

  Kähn, H. C., Zablotski, Y., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2023). Therapeutic success in fragmented coronoid process disease and other canine medial elbow compartment pathology: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1228497.

  Obel, C., Bergström, A., Comin, A., & Engdahl, K. (2023). Long-term outcomes in dogs with elbow dysplasia, assessed using the Canine Orthopaedic Index. Veterinary Record, 193(7), e2950.

  Preston, T., & Wills, A. P. (2018). A single hydrotherapy session increases range of motion and stride length in Labrador Retrievers diagnosed with elbow dysplasia. The Veterinary Journal, 234, 105–110.

Elbow Dysplasia Rehabilitation FAQ

• When should rehabilitation begin for elbow dysplasia?

  Rehabilitation should begin as soon as pain is adequately controlled and the veterinarian determines the patient is medically stable. Early controlled movement helps preserve joint mobility while reducing the risk of muscle loss and compensation.

• Can dogs with elbow dysplasia improve without surgery?

  Maybe. Dogs with mild to moderate disease respond well to conservative management that combines weight management, pain control, structured rehabilitation, and activity modification. For dogs who fail conservative management, surgery may be indicated.

• What activities should dogs with elbow dysplasia avoid?

  High-impact activities such as repetitive ball chasing, jumping, rough play, sharp turns, and uncontrolled running should be minimized, particularly during flare-ups or rehabilitation.

• How long does rehabilitation take?

  Most dogs show meaningful improvement over several months, but elbow dysplasia is a lifelong condition. Ongoing strengthening, weight management, and periodic rehabilitation help maintain long-term function.

• What is the primary goal of rehabilitation?

  The goal is not simply eliminating lameness. Rehabilitation aims to reduce pain, improve functional mobility, restore symmetrical movement, minimize compensatory injuries, and slow progression of osteoarthritis for the remainder of the dog's life.

To learn more, download the Elbow Dysplasia Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources..

Carpus Hyperextension Rehabilitation

Overview

Carpus hyperextension occurs when the palmar support system fails, affecting ligaments, fibrocartilage, and flexor structures. Successful rehabilitation depends on identifying instability severity, protecting healing tissues, and rebuilding dynamic muscular support.

Key Clinical Points

• Accurate grading drives decision-making

  • Stress radiographs remain the diagnostic cornerstone for identifying instability.

  • Musculoskeletal ultrasound may help characterize palmar ligament, fibrocartilage, and tendon involvement.

• Stability determines treatment pathway

  • Some injuries may respond to OTC or custom orthotic support combined with rehabilitation.

  • Complete disruption of palmar support structures has limited healing capacity with conservative care alone.

• Dynamic support matters

  • Carpal and digital flexor strength contribute to functional stabilization.

“Successful outcomes depend on matching tissue healing, stability needs, and exercise progression to each patient’s presentation.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Protect injured palmar structures while maintaining safe limb use.

• Restore controlled terminal stance stability.

• Improve neuromuscular activation and dynamic muscular support.

• Address secondary compensations throughout the kinetic chain.

• Use functional assessment and tissue tolerance to guide progression.

Evidence Snapshot

• Imaging improves diagnosis and injury classification.

• Orthotic management may support selected ligament injuries.

• Progressive loading supports long-term functional recovery.

Clinical Pearls

• Evaluate the whole patient, not only the carpus; compensatory changes may occur in adjacent joints and the entire kinematic chain.

• Orthotic success depends on fit, skin tolerance, owner compliance, and integration with rehabilitation.

• Terminal stance control is a key functional indicator during recovery.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

Watch clinical demonstrations, treatment techniques, and practical applications.

• References

  Beierer LH. Canine carpal injuries: From fractures to hyperextension injuries. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2021;51(2):285-303. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.12.002

  González-Rellán S, Fdz-de-Trocóniz P, Barreiro A. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the palmar region of the carpus of the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2023;64(3):546-556. doi:10.1111/vru.13224

  Tomlinson JE, Manfredi JM. Evaluation of application of a carpal brace as a treatment for carpal ligament instability in dogs: 14 cases (2008–2011). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;244(4):438-443. doi:10.2460/javma.244.4.438

  Twarowska J, Strychalski J, Gugołek A. A pilot study on the effects of a 10-session underwater treadmill programme on canine joint range of motion. Animals (Basel). 2025;15(21):3186. doi:10.3390/ani15213186

Carpus Hyperextension Rehabilitation FAQ

• When Can Rehabilitation for Carpus Hyperextension Begin?

  Rehabilitation can begin once the patient has been evaluated by the veterinary team and the severity of instability has been identified. Treatment planning depends on the diagnosis, stress radiograph findings, soft tissue involvement, and whether the injury is managed conservatively with an orthotic or surgically.

  Early rehabilitation focuses on protecting injured structures, maintaining safe mobility, and supporting neuromuscular function while preventing excessive carpal extension.

• How Do I Know if Rehabilitation Is Working?

  Successful rehabilitation is measured by improved standing carpus extension PROM angle. Important functional indicators include:

  • Improved weight bearing and gait quality

  • Better terminal stance stability

  • Reduced pain or compensatory movement patterns

  • Improved tolerance to daily activities

  • Appropriate use and comfort with an orthotic when indicated

  Ongoing assessment helps determine when loading and activity can safely progress.

• How Long Does It Take for Carpus Hyperextension to Completely Heal?

  Recovery depends on injury severity, tissue involvement, treatment approach, and patient goals.

  Mild ligament injuries may improve with conservative management, orthotic support, and rehabilitation. More severe injuries involving structural instability often require surgical stabilization before progressing through rehabilitation.

  Because ligament and soft tissue healing occurs gradually, return to full activity is based on functional stability, strength, comfort, and veterinary clearance rather than time alone.

• Can Dogs Recover From Carpus Hyperextension Without Surgery?

  Some dogs with mild or selected moderate injuries may be candidates for conservative care using a custom orthotic combined with structured rehabilitation.

  Dogs with complete ligament failure, luxation, or significant instability typically require surgical consultation because damaged palmar support structures may not provide enough stability for normal weight bearing.

  Determining the appropriate pathway requires clinical examination and diagnostic evaluation.

• What is the Goal of Rehabilitation for Carpus Hyperextension?

  The goal of rehabilitation is to help the dog regain comfortable, controlled movement by improving:

  • Limb strength

  • Dynamic muscular support

  • Balance and coordination

  • Functional stability

  • Safe return to daily activities

  Rehabilitation supports the healing process while helping reduce compensatory movement patterns throughout the body.

To learn more, download the Carpus Hyperextension Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.

Carpus Arthrodesis Rehabilitation

Overview

Carpus arthrodesis is performed to restore stability following traumatic or chronic carpal collapse by surgically eliminating motion at the affected joint(s) and achieving surgical stabilization. Rehabilitation after partial or pancarpal arthrodesis focuses on protecting the surgical construct, managing distal limb edema, preserving mobility of adjacent joints, and restoring functional strength. Because loss of carpal motion alters thoracic limb biomechanics, rehabilitation emphasizes compensatory mobility, proximal limb strengthening, controlled loading, and safe progression based on clinical assessment and radiographic evidence of healing.

Key Clinical Points

• Protect the Fusion During Healing

  • Surgical fixation restores stability, but progression must be guided by clinical findings and radiographic confirmation of osseous healing.

  • Consistent weight bearing, controlled swelling, and absence of increasing pain are key indicators for advancement.

• Treat the Entire Thoracic Limb Kinetic Chain

  • Loss of carpal motion eliminates normal elastic recoil during terminal stance.

  • Rehabilitation should address digit mobility, elbow and shoulder function, and proximal strength to support long-term compensation.

• Progress Loading Based on Function, Not Time Alone

  • Recovery requires gradual restoration of strength, endurance, and functional mobility while protecting the surgical construct.

  • Changes in lameness, swelling, or comfort should guide modification of activity progression.

“Successful outcomes depend on maintaining distal limb range of motion to compensate for loss of motion at the carpus.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Improve functional weight-bearing to promote bone healing.

• Maintain distal and proximal joint PROM and AROM.

• Educate caregivers on importance of controlled activity until radiographic evidence of healing.

Evidence Snapshot

• Stress radiography remains an important diagnostic tool for confirming carpal hyperextension and identifying instability location.

• Complete rupture of palmar support structures has limited healing capacity under normal weight-bearing forces, making surgical stabilization the preferred approach for many severe injuries.

• Pancarpal arthrodesis provides predictable stability when multiple carpal levels are affected, while partial arthrodesis may be considered when instability is limited.

Clinical Pearls

• Monitor the full limb, not only the carpus: elbow, shoulder, cervical, and thoracolumbar compensation may influence recovery.

• Functional goals should reflect patient needs, such as comfortable walking, stair navigation, and return to daily activities.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

Watch clinical demonstrations, treatment techniques, and practical applications.

• References

  Beierer LH. Canine carpal injuries: From fractures to hyperextension injuries. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2021;51(2):285-303. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.12.002

  González-Rellán S, Fdz-de-Trocóniz P, Barreiro A. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the palmar region of the carpus of the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2023;64(3):546-556. doi:10.1111/vru.13224

  Tomlinson JE, Manfredi JM. Evaluation of application of a carpal brace as a treatment for carpal ligament instability in dogs: 14 cases (2008–2011). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;244(4):438-443. doi:10.2460/javma.244.4.438

  Twarowska J, Strychalski J, Gugołek A. A pilot study on the effects of a 10-session underwater treadmill programme on canine joint range of motion. Animals (Basel). 2025;15(21):3186. doi:10.3390/ani15213186

Carpus Arthrodesis Rehabilitation FAQ

• When Can Carpal Arthrodesis Rehabilitation Begin?

  Carpal arthrodesis rehabilitation can begin following veterinary clearance after surgery. Early rehabilitation focuses on protecting the surgical fixation, controlling swelling, maintaining mobility of surrounding joints, and encouraging safe functional use of the limb while bone healing progresses.

• How Do I Know if Carpal Arthrodesis Rehabilitation Is Working?

  Carpal arthrodesis rehabilitation progress is based on objective clinical findings including improved weight bearing, decreased swelling, improved comfort, maintained digit mobility, and improved functional movement. Progression should be guided by clinical assessment and confirmation of osseous healing before higher-load activities are introduced.

• How Long Does It Take for Carpal Arthrodesis to Completely Heal?

  Carpal arthrodesis healing depends on surgical stabilization, patient factors, and surgical recovery. Follow-up radiographs are used to confirm osseous healing before return to higher-level activity. Rehabilitation continues beyond bone healing to restore strength, endurance, and adaptation to the fused joint.

• Can Patients Recover Without Carpal Arthrodesis Surgery?

  Carpal arthrodesis is typically recommended when instability is severe or when the supporting structures of the carpus cannot provide functional stability. Mild or partial carpal injuries may be managed differently, but patients requiring arthrodesis need surgical fusion to restore mechanical stability.

• What Is the Goal of Carpal Arthrodesis Rehabilitation?

  The goal of carpal arthrodesis rehabilitation is to protect surgical healing while helping the patient regain comfortable, functional mobility. Treatment focuses on managing swelling, maintaining adjacent joint mobility, restoring strength, improving endurance, and supporting long-term compensation after loss of carpal motion.

To learn more, download the Carpus Arthrodesis Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.

Biceps Brachii Injury Rehabilitation

Overview

Biceps brachii injuries are a common cause of chronic front limb lameness in dogs. These injuries may involve the muscle, tendon, surrounding tissues, or occur with other shoulder conditions. Successful rehabilitation focuses on identifying the source of pain, protecting healing tissues, rebuilding strength, and safely returning the patient to activity.

Key Clinical Points

Accurate diagnosis guides treatment
○ Identifying the biceps brachii as the source of pain is essential for selecting the right treatment approach.
○ Imaging can help determine injury severity and guide rehabilitation decisions.

Tendon healing requires gradual progression
○ Improved movement does not always mean the tendon has fully healed.
○ Exercises should progress based on comfort, strength, and tissue tolerance.

The whole shoulder must be considered
○ Biceps brachii injuries often occur with other shoulder conditions.
○ Addressing strength, stability, and movement patterns supports long-term recovery.

“Successful tendon rehabilitation requires balancing protection of healing tissues with progressive loading to restore strength and function.”

Rehabilitation Priorities

• Reduce pain and inflammation while protecting irritated biceps tissue.
• Maintain comfortable shoulder mobility without overstressing healing structures.
• Restore neuromuscular control and shoulder stabilization.
• Progressively rebuild tendon load tolerance and muscular strength.
• Monitor for recurrence, compensation, or signs that additional diagnostics are needed.

Evidence Snapshot

• Musculoskeletal ultrasound is an important diagnostic tool for evaluating biceps tendon fiber changes, tendon enlargement, mineralization, and response to treatment.

• Conservative management has shifted toward structured rehabilitation with functional reassessment rather than relying on fixed recovery timelines.

• Progressive exercise loading is a key component of tendon rehabilitation, with early low-load activation progressing toward strengthening as tissue tolerance improves.

Clinical Pearls

• Evaluate the entire shoulder, not only the biceps tendon; compensatory changes and concurrent pathology may influence recovery.

• Avoid progressing activity based only on improved gait — tendon remodeling and functional strength require additional time.

• Flare-ups should be treated as a clinical signal to reassess loading, activity level, and contributing factors.

Continue Learning

View the complete rehabilitation protocol.

Deliver home exercise programs and client education.

Watch clinical demonstrations, treatment techniques, and practical applications.

• References

  Arena, I., Valentini, S., Nundini, L., Dalmonte, T., & Spinella, G. (2025). Physiotherapy treatment of musculo-tendinous disorders of the canine shoulder: A clinical study. The Veterinary Journal, 313, 106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106379

  Becker, W., Kowaleski, M. P., McCarthy, R. J., & Blake, C. A. (2015). Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for shoulder lameness in dogs. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 51(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6030

  Kern, T., Manfredi, J., & Tomlinson, J. (2023). Ultrasonographic appearance of supraspinatus and biceps tendinopathy improves in dogs treated with low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy: A retrospective study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1238513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1238513

  Lane, D. M., von Pfeil, D. J. F., & Kowaleski, M. P. (2023). Synthesis of surgeon and rehabilitation therapist treatment methods of bicipital tenosynovitis in dogs allows development of an initial consensus therapeutic protocol. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 262(10), 1–8.

Biceps Brachii Rehabilitation FAQ

• When Can Rehabilitation for a Biceps Brachii Injury Begin?

  Rehabilitation for a Biceps Brachii Injury can begin after veterinary evaluation confirms the diagnosis and the patient is appropriate for controlled therapeutic activity. Early rehabilitation focuses on decreasing pain and inflammation, protecting the tendon, maintaining safe mobility, and preventing compensatory movement patterns.

• How Do I Know if Rehabilitation for a Biceps Brachii Injury is Working?

  Rehabilitation for a Biceps Brachii Injury is working when the patient demonstrates reduced pain with shoulder testing, improved limb use, decreased lameness, improved strength, and the ability to tolerate gradually increasing activity without symptom flare-ups.

• How Long Does It Take for a Biceps Brachii Injury to Completely Heal?

  Recovery from a Biceps Brachii Injury varies depending on severity, chronicity, concurrent shoulder pathology, and treatment approach. Many patients require several months of structured rehabilitation because tendon remodeling and restoration of load tolerance occur gradually.

• Can Dogs Recover From a Biceps Brachii Injury Without Surgery?

  Many dogs with a Biceps Brachii Injury can improve without surgery when the tendon remains functional and symptoms respond to appropriate medical management, activity modification, and rehabilitation. Surgery may be considered for severe tendon damage or cases that do not respond to conservative care.

• What is the Goal of Rehabilitation for a Biceps Brachii Injury?

  The goal of rehabilitation for a Biceps Brachii Injury is to reduce pain, restore shoulder mobility, rebuild strength, improve tendon capacity, and help the patient safely return to daily activities while reducing the risk of recurrence.

To learn more, download the Biceps Brachii Injury Treatment Protocol Workbook today for complete rehabilitation guidelines and clinical decision-making resources.